Peer Review 12b

Let me preface this by saying that I LOVE STAR WARS. My family would watch one of the Star Wars movies at least every other day while I was growing up and one of my dog's names is Wookie if that tells you anything. So I have basically been waiting my whole life for the new Star Wars movie.

• I peer reviewed Jacob Corbin's rhetorical analysis of Star Wars: The Force Awakens

• I decided to make a brainstorming suggestion about the rhetorical analysis. The argument is clear, but make sure your audience is following your train of thought since I was a little confused reading through it. What's the importance of "The Force Awakens" having overdone story elements from previous Star Wars movies? Is it bad? Good? Neither? Make sure you explain a little bit before you delve into your argument. 

• I think that the audience having a little background information leading up to the argument will be beneficial so the audience can follow what the author is trying to argue. This way the argument itself will be well-developed and it will be harder to refute based off of the author's credibility.

• I incorporated the idea that background information is crucial in developing an argument from the suggested readings. Without background information, the audience has no context to what the argument is trying to prove.

• I love how confident the tone was in his writing. I didn't question his authority the entire time I was reading the analysis. I hope that my project will sound so confident that people won't question my authority on the topic.